Health Mandates: A Talk With Obama Health Advisor David Cutler

December 1, 2007

Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, and Barack Obama have each presented detailed proposals for health reform. The Clinton and Edwards plans include health mandates, which require Americans to obtain health care coverage or face (unspecified) sanctions. The Obama plan does not include mandates.

Health mandates are popular among many Democratic-leaning health policy analysts. The Clinton campaign has been going after Obama aggressively on this issue. They’ve said that the absence of mandates is a basic flaw in Obama’s plan; suggested a cynical political calculus behind Obama’s position said that his position feeds a Republican narrative; and took the position that Obama’s plan is politically vulnerable while theirs (and Edwards’) is a political plus in the general election.

(The preceding positions were echoed today by Paul Krugman – see my response, “Why Paul Krugman Is Wrong …“)

I don’t support any Democratic candidate, but I do have strong opinions about health mandates. As a long-time healthcare policy analyst and health manager in the private sector, I disagree with Paul Krugman, Ezra Klein, Jacob Hacker, and others who support mandates. My differences are based on policy effectiveness, issues of fairness, and Democratic political strategy. I think mandates pose more problems than they solve, and that they could be a political loser for Democrats in the general election.

I’ve been engaged in a collegial debate with Klein, blogger/consultant Joe Paduda and others on this topic for some time (see, for example, here, here, here, and here). During an exchange with Klein over the last week it became apparent that, while I had reasons to support Obama’s policy, it was unclear to me what his team’s current thinking was on the topic.

The team published a rebuttal to Clinton’s campaign late today. Earlier I spoke with David Cutler about mandates. Cutler is Professor of Applied Economics at Harvard, Obama’s senior health advisor, and the principal architect of the Obama plan.
________________________

“I’d like to start with a general comment,” Cutler began. “Two possible reasons why people don’t have health coverage are usually given. One is that the uninsured are gaming the system. The other is that they can’t afford it and don’t know where to get it. Most of the literature suggests that the explanation is mostly the latter. That means the single biggest thing we can do to help the uninsured is to make coverage affordable and accessible.”

“That’s why all the Democratic plans focus on removing excessive profits where they exist, improving information technology, and so forth,” Cutler continued. “All the plans do those things, although I think the Obama plan does the most.”

“The mandate argument is: You must buy something – but I’m not going to tell you what it is, how much it will cost, or where you’re going to get it.”

“It comes down to this,” said Cutler. “You’ll never get someone to buy something if it’s not affordable and not accessible. People just don’t do it.”

That’s an area where the Edwards campaign has taken the lead. They suggest automatic enrollment whenever an American intersects with the health care system or government services.

“You can enroll them,” Cutler replied, “and then forcibly collect the premiums. That’s one way to solve the problem. But it’s not necessary to do that.”

“A better approach is to do everything possible to make it affordable and available. When it is, almost everyone will have it.”

There are a couple of concerns about that approach. One is the problem of “adverse selection.” Sicker people – or people with a greater likelihood of becoming sick – will enroll. That will drive plan costs up, making it prohibitively expensive.

“Let’s look at the level of coverage you can get without a mandate. Our estimates, based on studies in the literature, is that we can get 98% or 99% coverage without a mandate for adults. There may be some small pockets of people who choose not to buy it.”

What about those people?

“If there are free riders, Obama is open to mandates. But what he is saying is ‘Look, mandates seem like a panacea, but that’s not where the hard work needs to be done.’ Auto insurance is a mandate, too, and not everyone has that. You’ve got to prove to the public that you’re willing to do the hard work.’”

Would mandates be considered at that point?

“He hasn’t ruled anything out. It’s a matter of priorities. The fact is, the policy differences on the mandate issue aren’t that large at all. Sen. Obama believes they’re an option down the road, if other approaches don’t work.”

And yet Sen. Clinton made another speech about mandates and universal coverage yesterday. And the Clinton had ( Clinton Campaign Manager) Patti Solis Doyle and (Policy Director) Neera Tanden talk about health care differences with reporters this morning.**

And Paul Krugman weighed in on the pro-mandate side of the debate, too.

“I know the arguments,” said Cutler, “but look at the evidence. What really matters is: Can they afford the coverage?”

Part of the debate involves political communications: Is the mandate issue a winner for Democrats in the general election, or a liability?

“I don’t get involved in the politics of it.”

What about the concern – which I and others share – that insurance premiums are an inherently regressive form of ‘taxation.’ The state of Massachusetts has had to waive the mandate for 20% of the uninsured as a result. All the campaigns have been forced to create fairly complex subsidy structures in an attempt to offset that regressivity, but paying for some portion of health insurance out of general tax revenues – either for a public system or some type of voucher – would be less regressive. What about taxation as a funding mechanism?

“That doesn’t seem to be on the table now for any of the candidates.”

Then the devil is in the details, isn’t it? What would premiums costs? Who would get a subsidy, and for how much? Nobody is debating these issues with any specificity, and yet that’s where – arguably – the real debate should take place.

“That’s why we’re suggesting that we lower costs first. Otherwise, you’re saying you want to force people to buy something, but we don’t know how much it will cost or what you’ll get in return.”

There’s been talk that a consensus is forming among policy analysts that 10% of income is the right number for total out-of-pocket health costs, including premiums, copays, and deductibles. But that’s a very high number for lots of people.

“Well, healthcare is 16% of the GDP now. Some of that cost is being borne through taxes already. So it depends what you want to count.”

But 10% for whom? $4,000 for a family of four with income of $40,000 is a devastating figure. Whereas there are probably very few people in the top 2% of income who spend 10% on healthcare.

“That’s where the subsidy debate comes in, and is another reason to address the cost issue first.”

____________________

Overall, Prof. Cutler had a clear and well-articulated response to many of the objections raised to the plan. Since he is not part of the campaign’s communication strategy, I did not ask him about the Clinton campaign’s accusation that Obama had been misleading in suggesting he had a universal coverage plan. He did make it clear that he feels a 98% enrollment level is possible without mandates, and that if that fails Obama will consider their use.

In my opinion, both the Clinton and Obama campaigns could have communicated their points more clearly – and with less heat. It was for this reason that I contacted Prof. Cutler. I have asked him for more background on that 98%-99% enrollment estimate. He says its an “internal calculation,” and it seems quite high to me. I’ll provide any further information as I receive it.

__________________

** I was unable to participate in the conference call because of short notice, but read the position statements released by the Clinton campaign afterward.

 

About these ads

24 Responses to “Health Mandates: A Talk With Obama Health Advisor David Cutler”


  1. [...] Health Mandates: A Talk With Obama Health Advisor David CutlerHillary Clinton, John Edwards, and Barack Obama have each presented detailed proposals for health reform. The Clinton and Edwards plans include health mandates, which require Americans to obtain health care coverage or face … Lack of health insurance leads to Clinton hostage crisis in New …The man who taped road flares to his body and took over a Clinton campaign office in Rochester, NH, tried to seek admission to an alcohol detox center earlier in the week but was turned away because he did not have health insurance. … Clinton Campaign Calls Obama Health Care Ad MisleadingThe Clinton campaign this morning called on the Obama campaign to stop running a campaign television commercial in New Hampshire that asserts that his health insurance plan will cover all Americans. [...]

  2. Maggie mahar Says:

    Very interesting interview. I’m posting about it on HealthBeat (www.healthbeat.blog.org)


  3. [...] Of particular interest is the Sentinel Effect’s conversation with Harvard health economist David Cutler. [...]


  4. [...] 3. Mandates: Lots and lots of blogosphere discussion of the individual mandate in the context of the Clinton-Obama campaigns back-and-forth. The issue broke out of blogworld with NYTimes columnist Paul Krugman’s column, here. Interesting places to join the discussion are here, here and here. [...]

  5. Peter Says:

    Mr. Obama sadly to say is a man in a suit with little substance running a media image- in times like these we need a more substantive candidate- Mr Obama has thus far presented little to me to prove he has the qualifications to be President even during benign times.


  6. Lot of thing being discussed here. A nice blog on health mandate. Keep going…


  7. Although he does not elaborate, I believe that politically, not having mandates will greatly increase the possibility that Obama’s plan will become law. People are not ready for a “my way or the highway” approach.


  8. Quote:

    ” I have asked him for more background on that 98%-99% enrollment estimate. He says its an “internal calculation,” and it seems quite high to me. I’ll provide any further information as I receive it.”

    Looking back at this post, I would certainly agree with your assessment that 98-99% is quite an unrealistic figure!

    Dr. Edward Smithers,

    http://www.breast-cancer-free.com/

  9. reskow Says:

    I was dubious even then …

  10. shingli Says:

    “A better approach is to do everything possible to make it affordable and available. When it is, almost everyone will have it.”

    I don’t we will have to worry about mandates now as a health insurance bill won’t have a chance of getting passed now that we are broke!

    Thanks, Shingli

    One thing you can do if your home is in forclosure is to visit
    http://www.stopforeclosureus.com There you will find a way to stop your mortgage company from foreclosing on your home. Good forclosure information there.

  11. Seth Says:

    Well now that Obama is president I hope that we will see his promises for our health care system put into action!

  12. iDEA Desk Says:

    All over the country, innovative ideas are being implemented in the workplace to improve the health of workers and reduce the rising rate of health care spending. Skyrocketing health care costs are crushing families and companies, impeding businesses’ ability to expand and compete, and stunting the country’s economic growth. Some employers and unions – spanning industries, firm size, and workforce demographics – are using creative approaches to reverse that trend in their workplaces.


  13. President Obama is tying to save resources. It is good idea to save wasteful expenditures but no on the cost of health facilities. Best form of governments are social welfare states. Global health issues have revolutionized in this modern internet age with top search engines. Now communities worldwide can search and connect.

  14. Rod Macbeth Says:

    Super read. Thanks.


  15. Vitamin+health

    Vitamins and health
    1. Introduction. What are vitamins?

    Vitamins are known to us for over 100 years. They have written and said quite a lot. But what are vitamins? What are they different from other biologically active substances? Once upon a time there were more than two dozen, but now vitamins include all 13 compounds. At the same time, there are the so-called “vitaminopodobnye substance.” What are they different from the vitamins? Let’s start with the definition of “vitamins.”

    Vitamins – essential organic substances necessary to sustain the vital functions of the organism involved in the regulation of biochemical and physiological processes, biomolecules with a predominantly regulatory functions entering the body with food, “” indispensable (essential) food substances which do not occur in formed in the body or not enough. ”
    vitamin+health


  16. [...] show that it does not. (Remember, Obama opposed an individual mandate in the primaries last year.  Here’s a Democratic take on why that was smart politics for [...]


  17. There is obviously a lot to learn. There are some good points here.

    -Robert Shumake Paul Nicoletti


  18. There are different types of automobile insurance based on the power that this type of coverage of the vehicle. personal auto insurance varies, and different types of insurance application based on your preferences and how much you’re willing to separate you from your coverage of the vehicle.

  19. acai order Says:

    Nice post. Insightful and entertaining as always!


  20. This makes sense and it was very helpful to me.

  21. exceedeLype Says:

    Herbs are considered to be quality’s gift to mankind.
    Thousands of years of growing include made plants the ultimate settlement to the form needs of mankind.
    How do you about our ancestors lived their lives so healthy?
    They lived representing so prolonged while most of us are struggling by means of the life-span of 30.

    Most people are unaware of the benefits of herbs. We don’t recriminate them.
    A share of attention was put on the treatment provided past chemical medication, that regular protect took a backseat.
    Herbal Care has ensured that things difference seeking the good.
    We at Herbal Trouble receive developed a cable of regular products that take been helping people distribute with their conditions in a positive manner.

    http://www.effective-herbs.com


  22. Hello, I like this. It is really helpful to me. If you are looking for others Ican try to help mine the link. Please test my hyperlinks, you will be able to create a things you like. Thank you.

  23. Anonymous Says:

    Excellent article , I’m going to spend a lot more time reading about this topic


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: