An analyst with the Reason Foundation has written a critique of the Schwarzenegger health plan in which she says that it’s “audacious, ambitious – and awful.” Shikha Dalmia, whose employer is described as a “free-market think tank” (does that mean libertarian?), argues that the plan criminalizes rather than helps the lower-income uninsured.
In this paragraph, Ms. Dalmia neatly summarizes why some critics feel the plan won’t work and will “criminalize” the poor:
These fines might still be much cheaper than buying insurance. In that case, many low-income families could opt to pay the fines or avoid filing taxes altogether — becoming tax fugitives — rather than buying health coverage. In effect, a program meant to help low-income people will tax them or turn them into criminals.
Ms. Dalmia suggests that California wait until the first year results are in for the Massachusetts plan in July. (I think that’s early; mandatory coverage only went into effect on January 1 in Massachusetts.)